Thursday, October 17, 2024

The Dispensations & Covenants of Holy Scripture


“Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.” (1 Tim. 2:15)

What is a Dispensation/Dispensationalism?

According to the note in the Scofield Reference Bible, “a dispensation is a period of time during which man is tested in respect to obedience to some specific revelation of the will of God.” A dispensation is a system of divine administration, a way of ordering things during a particular period of time. Each dispensation in Scripture is a divinely appointed age.

Dispensationalism is a theological understanding of the Bible. Dispensationalism has two main distinctives. Firstly, a literal interpretation of Scripture, especially regarding Biblical prophecy. Secondly, a consistent view of the nation of Israel and the Church being unique and separate in God’s plan. Classical dispensationalism identifies seven dispensations in God’s plan for humanity.

We are going to look at the seven dispensations of the Bible. We are also going to learn the revelation of God in each dispensation, man’s responsibility in each dispensation, how man failed in each dispensation, and the judgment of God that ended each dispensation.

The First Dispensation - Innocence

The first dispensation of Scripture is innocence. Man was created in innocence. God created mankind to live in perfect harmony and fellowship with Him. God created man in His image and placed him in a perfect environment (Garden of Eden), and gave him just one simple commandment, to walk in obedience. Man had other responsibilities in the Garden of Eden such as to tend to the garden, but obedience was the chief principle in this dispensation. God warned man of the consequences of disobedience (death). Man fell by a deliberate act of rebellion. God said, “...for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die” (Genesis 2:17). We also see the grace of God on display, as Adam and Eve did not die immediately they continued to live. However, their bodies began to die and one day they died physically. Death came into the world as a punishment and judgment on mankind by God. This dispensation ended by expulsion from the Garden of Eden.

In the first dispensation we also learn of the first of the Bible’s Covenants. The first covenant is the Edenic Covenant. The Scofield Reference Bible identifies eight covenants. The other seven are Adamic, Noahic, Abrahamic, Mosaic, Land, Davidic and New of which we will read about later in this paper.

The Edenic Covenant

God made a covenant with Adam in the Garden of Eden. This is called the Edenic Covenant which is sometimes called the Covenant of Works. In Scripture we learn of two types of covenants, some are unconditional and some are based on conditions. The Edenic Covenant is an example of a covenant based on conditions because Adam was required by God to obey the terms and conditions that came with the covenant. The conditions of the Edenic Covenant was obedience. Man had to obey God to receive the blessings of the covenant established. The Edenic Covenant is not explicitly called a covenant in the Book of Genesis; but it is called a covenant in Hosea 6:7 where the Bible says, “But they like Adam have transgressed the covenant: there have they dealt treacherously against me” (Darby).

In the Edenic Covenant, God promised Adam life and blessing based on his obedience to the boundary that God set. The penalty for breaking the conditions was physical and spiritual death as well as a curse from God on the ground. One of the consequences of Adam’s sin was hard work to grow crops and to toil all the days of his life (Genesis 3:17-19). This covenant lays the basics for God’s plan of redemption as it shows man’s inability to walk in obedience to God all the days of his life and to keep a right relationship with God.

The Adamic Covenant

We see the second of the Bible’s covenants established in Genesis 3:14-19. The Adamic Covenant can be explained in two parts; the Edenic Covenant (works) and the Adamic Covenant (grace). This covenant of God can be found in Genesis 1:26-30 and Genesis 2:16-17. The Adamic Covenant conditions the life of fallen mankind. The elements of this covenant are as follows. (1) The serpent was cursed and becomes God’s example of the nature of fallen man and sin. (2) The first promise of a Redeemer. (3) The changed state of the woman. Particularly in regards to childbirth and the headship of the man. (4) The earth is cursed for man’s sake. (5) The sorrow and suffering of life. (6) Physical death. We see here the promise of God to send a Redeemer to reconcile man to Himself. Here God promises the One born of the woman’ seed will crush the head of the serpent. Even during the curse God is gracious.

The Second Dispensation - Conscience

By disobedience man came to a personal understanding of good (by obedience) and evil (by disobedience). By this man’s conscience was awoken and was required by God to do all known good and to refrain from doing evil. The testing of man in this dispensation is found in Genesis 6:5 and ended in divine judgment of the Flood. This dispensation covers a period of about 1,650 years. 

Guided by conscience man was commanded by God to choose to do good and to offer sacrifices to Him (Genesis 4:4). As we read the Scriptures during this dispensation we see that man waxed worse and worse. We learn of the first murder in the Bible when Cain killed his brother Abel (Genesis 4:8). Abel’s offering was pleasing unto God, but Cain’s was not. Cain had the chance to bring an acceptable offering to God. However, Cain grew jealous of his brother and slew him. This mindset is still with us today, as people try to attempt to approach God on their own bases and terms, rather than on God’s terms.

This is just one example of how mankind violated his conscience by failing to do good and committing evil. During this time of testing God showed us that conscience alone is not enough. We must live by something more than just our conscience. Only Abel, Enoch, and Noah were called righteous (Hebrews 11:2-7; Genesis 5:22-24; 6:8-9).  Conscience continues in all future dispensations.

The Third Dispensation - Human Government

We have seen that man failed in the first two dispensations. As a result God brought judgment on the world with a flood. Only eight people survived the flood, Noah and his family. The Flood marks the end of the second dispensation and the beginning of the third. In this next dispensation, God established Human Government and the Noahic Covenant. Man is now responsible for governing the world for God. This incudes all mankind both Jew and Gentile. The highest function of civil government is the judicial taking of life. Genesis 9:6 says, “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.” Here capital punishment is established. The Dispensation of Human Government continues to this day.

After the Flood God made man a agent of governing the world with the purpose to restrain evil and protect man from his own sinful nature. Noah and his family had the responsibility to repopulate the earth. Shem became the father of the Mediterranean and Jewish world. Ham’s generations populated Africa and Japheth’s descendants went to Europe and Asia. The failure to keep this dispensation resulted in God’s judgement again. God scattered his people and confuses the language of the people. The Gentile nations are now introduced.

The Noahic Covenant

God made a covenant with Noah and his seed. The elements of which are as follows. (1) The connection between humanity and the earth as established by the Adamic Covenant is reaffirmed. (2) The natural order is validated.  (3) The establishment of human governance is outlined. (4) The earth is guaranteed protection from another global deluge. This covenant is unconditional. It was made to Noah and all his descendants and to all mankind.  This covenant was sealed with a sign, the rainbow.

The Fourth Dispensation - Promise

In the fourth dispensation we see the establishment of the Abrahamic Covenant. Abraham and his descendants became heirs of the promise. This covenant is wholly of grace and unconditional. Abraham and his descendants had to abide in their own land to inherit the blessings of the promise. In Egypt they lost the blessing, but not the covenant. The Dispensation of Promise ended when Israel accepted the law (Exd. 19:8). The fourth dispensation is from Genesis 12:1 to Exodus 19:8. This dispensation was exclusively for Israel. Therefore the dispensation must be distinguished from the covenant. The dispensation is a time of testing and the covenant is everlasting. This is the only dispensation that was a testing of Israel, which ended at the giving of the law. The law did not revoke the Abrahamic Covenant (Gal. 3:15-18).

The Abrahamic Covenant

The Abrahamic Covenant is formed in Genesis 12:1-4 and confirmed in Genesis 13:14-17, 15:1-7 and 17:1-8. God promised to make from Abraham a great nation. That nation will be blessed spiritually and naturally (Gal. 3:13-14). God also said that he will bless those blesses that nation curse those who cursed it (Gen. 12:1). This covenant also solidifies the promises made in the Adamic Covenant concerning the the seed of the woman that would come through the line of Abraham and his descendants. The sign of this covenant is circumcision. The fulfilment of this covenant will come to pass in the Millennial Kingdom at Christ’s second coming (Luke 1:71-75 and Rom. 4:13).

The conferment of land is accompanied by predictions concerning three instances of dispossession and subsequent restoration (Gen. 15:13-16, Jer. 25:11-12, Deut. 28:62-65 and Deut. 30:1-3). Two of these instances of dispossession and restoration have already occurred. Currently, Israel is undergoing the third dispersion, from which it will be restored upon the return of the Lord as King, in accordance with the Davidic Covenant (Deut. 30:3, Jer. 23:5-8, Ezk. 37:21-25, Luke 1:30-33 and Acts 15:14-17).

In Genesis 12 God says five times, “I will.” Clearly, God is taking the responsibility of the covenant upon Himself. One day national Israel will repent and be restored to God’s favour (Zec. 12:10-14 and Rom. 11:25-27). One day Israel will possess all the land that God promised to them. This will happen when the Messiah returns to earth to establish His throne and rule the entire world. This time will be a time of peace, pleasure, and prosperity like the world has never seen before.

The Fifth Dispensation - Law

The dispensation of the law extends from the giving of the law at Sinai to the death of Christ on the Cross of Calvary. The history and indictment of Israel in the wilderness is an endless record of sin, rebellion and the violation of the law. The testing of the nation of Israel ended in the judgment of the Captivities, but the dispensation ended when Christ died on the Cross. Under this dispensation man had the responsibility to obey the law (Exd. 19:5-6 and Rom. 10:5). Man failed to obey the law of God (2 Kings 17:7-19 and Acts 2:22-23). This resulted in the judgement of God upon the children of Israel (2 Kings 17:1-6, 2 Kings 25:1-11 and Luke 21:20-24).

The history of Israel, spanning from Mount Sinai to the destruction of the temple in AD 70, represents a continuous record of transgressing God's Law. Nevertheless, the Law was ultimately fulfilled, as indicated by Christ's words in Matthew 5:17, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.” Christ met the demands of the Law. Due to Jesus’ flawless adherence to the Law, salvation is obtained through Him. We are not justified by observing the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ. So, we must put our faith in Christ to be justified before God (Gal. 2:16).

The Mosaic Covenant

The Mosaic Covenant was given to Israel. The distinct parts of this covenant are as follows. (1) The commandments of God given to Moses which express the divine will of God (Exd. 20.1-26). (2) The judgments of God concerning the social and religious life of the nation of Israel (Exd. 21:1-24:11 and 24:12-31). These elements are called “the law” as that is what they are referred to in the New Testament (Mat. 5:17-18). The sign of this covenant was the keeping of the Sabbath (Exd. 31:13). This covenant was abolished in the death of Christ (2 Cor. 3:9-11, Heb. 7:12-18, 8:13). There are 613 laws given which cover ceremonial, national and moral practices.

The Commandments and ordinances of God formed one religious system that had to be followed by Israel. The Christian is not under the conditional Mosaic Covenant of works and law, but under the New unconditional Covenant of Grace (Rom. 3:21-27, 6:14-15, Gal. 2:16, 3:10-26, 4:21-31 and Heb. 10:11-17).

The Land Covenant

The Land Covenant is sometimes referred to as the “Palestinian Covenant” and is recorded in Deuteronomy 29 and 30:1-10. The term “Palestinian Covenant” is never used in the Bible and the land that it speaks of is not called “Palestine” but Israel. In Deuteronomy 29:1 we learn that God made a covenant with Moses concerning the children of Israel. That is the reason why this covenant is called the Land Covenant because it relates to Israel’s possession of the Promised Land.

The Lord established this covenant with Israel following the Mosaic Covenant and after the Israelites had spent forty years in the wilderness. This covenant was made while they were in Moab, in anticipation of entering the Promised Land, and it was intended to remind this new generation of Israelites of their unique covenant relationship with God. The Land Covenant has many similarities to the Mosaic Covenant made at Mount Sinai but is a separate and distinct covenant as clearly seen in Deuteronomy 29:1.

Prior to establishing this covenant with Israel, God reminded them that adherence to the Mosaic Law would lead to abundant blessings for the nation, while disobedience to the Law would incur His curses upon them (Deuteronomy 28:1-68). Today the Jewish people are scattered in every nation of the world. When Christ returns to earth He will gather the Jews and restore them to the Land of Israel. The Land Covenant not only assures blessings for following God's commandments and curses for disobedience but also contains specific promises to Israel that will only be fully realised during Christ's millennial reign.

The Sixth Dispensation - Grace/Church

The sixth dispensation is the Church Age or the Age of Grace and it is the dispensation that we are currently under. The Church is distinct and separate from Israel. The Church is not Israel, and Israel is not the Church. Some of the characteristics of the Dispensation of Grace is that God’s grace is available to all people, and is dispensed to the world through the Church. During this dispensation Christ will build His Church and gives the Church the responsibility of preaching the Gospel to the ends of the earth. Another key aspect of this current dispensation is the fact the the Holy Spirit indwells with the Church which gives Christians the ability to live as Christ intended.

John 1:17 says, “For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.” The Dispensation of Grace began with the death and resurrection of Christ (Rom. 3:24-25, 4:24-25). In this dispensation there is no legal obedience as a condition of salvation. The testing in this dispensation is the acceptance or rejection of Christ as Lord and Saviour. Grace has a twofold manifestation (1) In salvation (Rom. 3:24). (2) In the walk and service of Christians (Rom. 6:15).

In this dispensation God speaks through His Son, Jesus Christ and through His Word, the Holy Bible. God requires all men and all nations to repent and believe the Gospel (Acts 17:30). Which means that all men are held responsible by God to believe and obey the Gospel (2 Thess. 1:8). The Scriptures teach that only a few are saved (Luke 13:23) meaning that the vast majority of the world reject Christ and believe “the lie” and reject “the truth” (2 Thess. 2:11).

The New Covenant

We also see the establishment of a new and better covenant than the Mosaic covenant (Rom. 8:3-4 and Heb. 7:19). The New Covenant is better because it is established on unconditional promises. In the Mosaic Covenant God said, “If ye will” in the New Covenant God says, “I will (Exd. 19:5 and Heb. 8:10-12). The New Covenant secures the personal salvation of every believer (Mat. 26:27-28, 1 Cor. 11:25 and Heb. 9:11-12). The New Covenant began with Christ’s blood (Luke 22:20).

We are no longer under Law but under grace (Rom. 6:14-15). The Old Covenant has been replaced by a better covenant (Heb. 7:22 and 8:6). Under the New Covenant sinners are saved from the penalty of their sins as a free gift by faith (Eph. 2:8-9). We are required by God to exercise faith in Christ, the One who fulfilled the Law on our behalf and by His sacrificial death on the cross brought and end to the Law’s sacrifices.

The Seventh Dispensation - The Millennial Kingdom

In the Scofield Reference Bible the seventh and final dispensation is called The Dispensation of the Fulness of Times. This is an apt name for the Seventh Dispensation as Ephesians 1:10 says, “That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in heaven, and which are on earth; even in him.”

This dispensation marks the time when oppression and misrule on earth will end by Christ taking His kingdom (Isa. 11:3-4). The time of toil ends in rest and reward (2 Thess. 1:6-7). The time of suffering ends in glory (Rom. 8:17-18). The time of Israel’s rejection ends and is restored (Rom. 11:25-27 and Ezk. 39:25-29). The time of the Gentiles ends and the setting up of the kingdom is established (Dan. 2:34-35 and Rev. 19:15-21). Some of the characteristics of this dispensation is Christ reigning as King (Zec. 14:9), Righteousness reigning (Isa. 11:4-5), Satan being bound, creation freed, and worldwide peace. This is the final test of man under 1,000 years of peace under the Prince of Peace, Jesus Christ.

The Davidic Covenant

This Dispensation of the Kingdom deals with the condition of life on earth and is identical to the Davidic Covenant (2 Sam. 7:8-17 and Zec. 12:8). Christ is the seed of David (2 Tim. 2:8 and Rev. 22:16). This covenant is what the kingdom of Christ is going to be built upon. This covenant promises a Davidic family, royal authority and a kingdom that is perpetual.

Only one monarch from the Davidic lineage has been anointed in Jerusalem, and he was crowned with thorns. However, the Davidic Covenant, which was affirmed to David through God’s oath and reiterated to Mary by the angel Gabriel, remains unchanging (Psa. 89:30-37). The Lord will ultimately bestow upon that thorn-crowned King "the throne of his father David" (Luke 1:31-33, Acts 2:29-32, 15:14-17). The sign of this covenant is Christ’s resurrection and enthronement.

Closing Remarks

This paper is written as an introduction to understanding the dispensations and covenants of the Bible. It is not intended to be a deep theological thesis on the subject matter, but merely as a taster, to wet your appetite to read and learn more on the topics written about.

The covenants in this paper are Biblical covenants. It is not to be confused with “Covenant Theology” which was established by Reformed theologians. In Covenant Theology there are only three covenants. (1) Covenant of Redemption. (2) Covenant of Works. (3) Covenant of Grace. None of these three are called covenants in the Bible. Also in Covenant Theology there is no difference made between Israel and the Church. Covenant Theology also teaches that there will not be a literal 1,000 year kingdom reign of Christ on earth. Therefore, Covenant Theology is an insufficient system for understanding the true covenants of Holy Scripture.

 

Nathan A. Hughes

WREXHAM

October 2024



 



 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, October 10, 2024

An Affirmation of Dispensationalism: God’s dealings with man down the ages

Last year I had a "road to Damascus moment" and I would like to share this with you. This paper has been written to defend dispensationalism and aid the reader in grasping the teachings of Dispensational Theology. It also serves as a response to my previous beliefs. I came to faith in the Lord in September 2012, which means I have been a Christian for 12 years. My Baptist Pastor guided me to the Lord, and I became a member of my local Baptist Chapel in November 2012 when I was baptized as a believer at just 18 years old. I cherished being part of that community. I later resigned my membership from the local Baptist Church for personal reasons and others, which I prefer not to elaborate on. These reasons were of lesser importance, and in hindsight, I realize I made an unwise decision due to my youth and lack of understanding. This choice led me into a rigorous, hardline Calvinist community. My Baptist Pastor worked diligently to guide, teach, and direct me on a proper path regarding life and theology. One important lesson I learned early on was that God interacts with different individuals in varied ways at different times, a concept known as dispensationalism.

After leaving the Baptist Church, I joined a Reformed Church because I was drawn to their street preaching methods and their strong stance on particular issues. It was during this period that I became familiar with Calvinism and the "TULIP" doctrines. In my youth, I wholeheartedly embraced Calvinism and advocated it with enthusiasm. My journey into Calvinism didn’t stem from Scripture alone; it was influenced by reading works by John Calvin and other historical Reformed theologians. These readings instilled in me a sense of pride, causing me to look down upon those who criticized Calvin or the authors I admired.

As a follower of Calvin, I was introduced to Covenant theology, replacement theology, and an amillennial perspective on the Bible. I was so committed to these doctrines that I even authored a book defending them, which I have since retracted from publication. What prompted me to reject Calvinism and revert to my dispensational roots? The simplest and most honest answer is that I revisited the Bible and challenged my beliefs. As I read Scripture and measured my Calvinist interpretations against it, I realized that many of my views did not align with biblical text. Now, at 30 years old and with over a decade of studying the Scriptures, I have concluded that my former beliefs were incorrect.

The doctrines I once embraced and have since renounced revolve around limited atonement, irresistible grace, and the Reformed perspective on Israel and the Church. My youthful fervour led me down a perilous and narrow-minded path that, through God’s grace, I have now turned away from. I am grateful that the blind spots have been cleared from my eyes, and the truth of Scripture has liberated me from erroneous beliefs. I have returned to my beginnings, and I hope this paper clarifies matters. We all experience phases in our youth where we hold onto false beliefs. Unfortunately for me, my errors were published. I cannot change the material that has been sold, other than to correct the record and retract all such publications. I have strived to do this as best as I can. By writing this paper, I anticipate facing criticism from my former Calvinist acquaintances, and they may use my past against me. I do not fear their judgment; I fear God. Thus, I have decided to write this paper with that perspective.

I have pondered numerous times throughout the writing process whether there is a necessity to address this topic and subject myself to criticism. Ultimately, I believe it is essential to clarify the record while being honest before the Lord. I do not consider myself an authority on Dispensationalism. Many have written extensively on this subject beyond my capacity. Since I have publicly expressed and defended Reformed theology and Replacement theology, I consider it appropriate to clarify my current stance. Writing this paper would have been unnecessary if I had privately adhered to Calvinism, Replacement theology, and Covenant theology, but that was not the case. I publicly declared my position due to my own actions and naivety. I realize that some may take time to accept my change of heart, but over time, I hope to heal wounds and restore fellowship. I have returned to my dispensational foundations, akin to the prodigal son’s return in Luke 15. I strayed from the truth by engaging with literature that led me toward Calvinism. After I became a believer, I was eager to explore materials regarding my new faith in Christ. I distinctly remember my Pastor’s loving warning that anything labelled “Reformed” was not beneficial and would lead me astray. I appreciate that guidance now, despite my initial disregard for it; through God’s grace, I have come to understand its significance.

No one transitions to Calvinism and Replacement Theology purely by studying the Bible. One must consult specific books that teach how to interpret certain Scripture passages through the lens of Reformed thought. Among the many books I read was the Westminster Confession of Faith, pivotal in shaping my understanding of Scripture and embracing doctrines absent in the Bible, which are rather man-made, such as infant baptism.

I wrote this paper to assist those who find themselves confined within Calvinistic theology. May the truth of Scripture liberate you from such bondage. I acknowledge that not all Reformed Christians reject a dispensational perspective and that some do not adhere to typical Reformed beliefs regarding Israel and the Church. Nonetheless, I contend that a majority who affirm Calvinism's five points also adopt a non-dispensational viewpoint.

Recently I had an idea to write a book on the topic of dispensationalism, (this paper would have been the introduction to the book). However, there are far greater works already available than I could ever write. One such publication I have found helpful and recommend is Dispensationalism by Charles C. Ryrie, which is a more extensive work than that of Mr. Scofield’s timeless classic, Rightly Dividing the Word of Truth.

The Seven Dispensations as Defined in the Scofield Reference Bible

The First Dispensation: Innocency. Man was created in innocency, placed in a perfect environment, subjected to an absolutely simple test, and warned of the consequence of disobedience. The woman fell through pride; the man, deliberately (1 Tim. 2:14). God restored His sinning creatures, but the dispensation of innocency ended in the judgment of the Expulsion (Gen. 3:24).

The Second Dispensation: Conscience. By disobedience man came to a personal and experimental knowledge of good and evil—of good as obedience, of evil as disobedience to the known will of God. Through that knowledge conscience awoke. Expelled from Eden and placed under the second, or Adamic Covenant, man was responsible to do all known good, to abstain from all known evil, and to approach God through sacrifice. The result of this second testing of man is stated in Gen. 6:5, and the dispensation ended in the judgment of the Flood. Apparently “the east of the garden” (v. 24), where were the cherubims and the flame, remained the place of worship through this second dispensation.

The Third Dispensation: Human Government. Under Conscience, as in Innocency, man utterly failed, and the judgment of the Flood marks the end of the second dispensation and the beginning of the third. The declaration of the Noahic Covenant subjects humanity to a new test. Its distinctive feature is the institution, for the first time, of human government—the government of man by man. The highest function of government is the judicial taking of life. All other governmental powers are implied in that. It follows that the third dispensation is distinctively that of human government. Man is responsible to govern the world for God. That responsibility rested upon the whole race, Jew and Gentile, until the failure of Israel under the Palestinian Covenant (Deut. 28–30:1–10) brought the judgment of the Captivities, when “the times of the Gentiles” (See Lk. 21:24; Rev. 16:14) began, and the government of the world passed exclusively into Gentile hands (Dan. 2:36–45; Lk. 21:24; Acts 15:14–17). That both Israel and the Gentiles have governed for self, not God, is sadly apparent. The judgment of the confusion of tongues ended the racial testing; that of the captivities the Jewish; while the Gentile testing will end in the smiting of the Image (Dan. 2.) and the judgment of the nations (Mt. 25:31–46).

The Fourth Dispensation: Promise. For Abraham and his descendants it is evident that the Abrahamic Covenant (Gen. 15:18, note) made a great change. They became distinctively the heirs of promise. That covenant is wholly gracious and unconditional. The descendants of Abraham had but to abide in their own land to inherit every blessing. In Egypt they lost their blessings, but not their covenant. The Dispensation of Promise ended when Israel rashly accepted the law (Ex. 19:8). Grace had prepared a deliverer (Moses), provided a sacrifice for the guilty, and by divine power brought them out of bondage (Ex. 19:4); but at Sinai they exchanged grace for law. The Dispensation of Promise extends from Gen. 12:1 to Ex. 19:8, and was exclusively Israelitish. The dispensation must be distinguished from the covenant. The former is a mode of testing; the latter is everlasting because unconditional. The law did not abrogate the Abrahamic Covenant (Gal. 3:15–18), but was an intermediate disciplinary dealing “till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made” (Gal. 3:19–29; 4:1–7). Only the dispensation, as a testing of Israel, ended at the giving of the law.

The Fifth Dispensation: Law. This dispensation extends from Sinai to Calvary—from the Exodus to the Cross. The history of Israel in the wilderness and in the land is one long record of the violation of the law. The testing of the nation by law ended in the judgment of the Captivities, but the dispensation itself ended at the Cross. (1) Man’s state at the beginning (Ex. 19:1–4). (2) His responsibility (Ex. 19:5, 6; Rom. 10:5). (3) His failure (2 Ki. 17:7–17, 19; Acts 2:22, 23). (4) The judgment (2 Ki. 17:1–6, 20; 25, 1–11; Lk. 21:20–24).

The Sixth Dispensation: Grace. As a dispensation, grace begins with the death and resurrection of Christ (Rom. 3:24–26; 4:24, 25). The point of testing is no longer legal obedience as the condition of salvation, but acceptance or rejection of Christ, with good works as a fruit of salvation (John 1:12, 13; 3:36; Mt. 21:37; 22:42; John 15:22, 25; Heb. 1:2; 1 John 5:10–12). The immediate result of this testing was the rejection of Christ by the Jews, and His crucifixion by Jew and Gentile (Acts 4:27). The predicted end of the testing of man under grace is the apostasy of the professing church (see “Apostasy,” 2 Tim. 3:1–8, note), and the resultant apocalyptic judgments. Grace has a twofold manifestation: in salvation (Rom. 3:24, refs.), and in the walk and service of the saved (Rom. 6:15, refs.).

The Seventh Dispensation: Kingdom. This, the seventh and last of the ordered ages which condition human life on the earth, is identical with the kingdom covenanted to David (2 Sam. 7:8–17; Zech. 12:8, Summary; Lk. 1:31–33; 1 Cor. 15:24, Summary), and gathers into itself under Christ all past “times”: (l) The time of oppression and misrule ends by Christ taking His kingdom (Isa. 11:3, 4). (2) The time of testimony and divine forbearance ends in judgment (Mt. 25:31–46; Acts 17:30, 31; Rev. 20:7–15). (3) The time of toil ends in rest and reward (2 Thes. 1:6, 7). (4) The time of suffering ends in glory (Rom. 8:17, 18). (5) The time of Israel’s blindness and chastisement ends in restoration and conversion (Rom. 11:25–27; Ezk. 39:25–29). (6) The times of the Gentiles end in the smiting of the image and the setting up of the kingdom of the heavens (Dan. 2:34, 35; Rev. 19:15–21). (7) The time of creation’s thraldom ends in deliverance at the manifestation of the sons of God (Gen. 3:17; Isa. 11:6–8; Rom. 8:19–21).

NATHAN A. HUGHES

WREXHAM

OCTOBER 10, 2024

 

`Sanctify them in the truth; Your word is truth.

John 17:17

Monday, May 06, 2024

Why a Monarchy is the best form of Government?

In this brief essay, I will set out why I think monarchy is superior to any other form of government. In the Western world we are taught to regard democracy as the ideal, and it has in many ways become an idol. Anyone who criticizes democracy is often seen as strange and an odd person. Democracy may read well on paper, but in practice it falls short. It originated with pagan Greek philosophers and is not grounded in Holy Scripture. While certain elements of democracy can be found in Scripture, overall it is not a Biblical Christian concept.

For instance, the Old Testament describes God appointing kings to govern particular lands. Some of those biblical rulers promoted the common good, while others were corrupt and acted as a curse on the regions they governed. In short, that is why I view monarchy as preferable to democracy.

My main point is that monarchy is often considered one of the most stable forms of government. History provides many examples of enduring, stable polities led by monarchs. From childhood, future kings and queens are instructed in just rule and schooled in the skills and practice of leadership. Consequently, they are usually better prepared and educated to fulfill the responsibilities of office, and they tend to hold moral and ethical convictions.

Secondly, a monarchy can lessen political polarization and corruption in a country. By curbing partisan contestation it tends to produce a more tranquil society. With a single person as head of state, and sometimes head of government, for life, opposition focuses on that one individual rather than on several leaders or political parties. In such systems the monarch usually has the final authority, meaning those born to rule actually exercise power. There are also fewer changes of leadership in an absolute monarchy; by contrast, in the United Kingdom power can shift every few years (typically about every five), which some see as offering less political stability. A monarchy also helps sustain a nation’s cultural identity, with the royal family embodying its values and beliefs.

One reason I'm not a strong supporter of democracy is that it relies on the idea that the people hold the power, even when many voters lack knowledge or education about the issues they're asked to decide. Most people vote for what benefits them or what they want, rather than for what is best for the country or the common good.

For instance, picture yourself on a plane having to choose which candidate should pilot it. Would you pick the person who promises first-class travel with the best food and drinks, or the one who offers economy seats and basic refreshments? Most people would opt for the first. What I didn’t mention earlier is that the first person has very little flight experience, while the second is the most capable and qualified for the role. That illustrates democracy: the majority decides, and power lies with the voters even when they pick the wrong candidate.

We observe this in most general elections. That is why politicians target voters’ personal needs and desires while having no real intention of honoring their campaign promises. For example, during the 2010 General Election Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg vowed to abolish tuition fees, which understandably attracted thousands of young people and students to vote for his party. Consequently, Clegg made substantial gains across the UK and won seats for the Liberal Democrats. Although they secured enough seats to support a Conservative-led government, that pledge was abandoned once they entered into government with the Conservatives. I am not singling out the Liberal Democrats here; I am merely using them as a clear example. Every political party does this to win votes. In a way they have to: if they were honest about the harsh reality of cuts and unpopular policies, voters would not support them. Regrettably, unpopular decisions sometimes must be taken for the common good.

Returning to my earlier point, a monarchy brings people together more effectively than political parties. In the UK, people across the political spectrum recognise the advantages of the monarchy and generally agree it benefits British society, tourism and culture. The late Queen Elizabeth II was a positive force throughout her 70-year reign. That was clear when she died, roughly a quarter of a million people paid their respects in person by viewing her coffin as it lay in state in London.

Another point I would make is that a monarchy can be less costly than a republic. It also boosts tourism: in the UK millions travel each year to see royal palaces and parks. By comparison, the French presidency costs around £103 million and Italy’s head of state about £193 million. The British monarchy costs taxpayers roughly £40 million a year, but the income generated by tourism makes its existence economically defensible. Former Bank of England rate-setter Tim Besley produced a paper arguing that countries with “weak executive constraints” that switch from a non-hereditary to a hereditary leader (i.e., to a monarchy) see their annual average economic growth rise by about 1.03% per year. In 2015 the British Royal Family contributed £1.155 billion to the economy, with £535 million coming from tourism. The fashion sector has felt the impact too: the ‘Kate effect’ is credited with injecting £152 million into the industry, the ‘Charlotte Effect’ £101 million, and the ‘George Effect’ £76 million.

There is much more that could be written and said on this subject, but this is my view on why I think we should abandon the current system of democratically elected politicians and establish absolute monarchical rule. It is not perfect or free of mistakes, yet I believe it is a far better form of government. In earlier times, when kings and queens ruled England and later the United Kingdom, the country was in a much stronger state than it is today.

We have just witnessed our first coronation in over seventy years in the United Kingdom. On May 6, 2023, more than 20 million people tuned in to watch King Charles III crowned at Westminster Abbey. Monarchy is far from dead; it remains lively and strong. God Save the King!